In brief
In response to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's claims that returning to higher standards for combat roles reflects male requirements, female veterans assert that they have never sought special treatment. They emphasize that the standards for combat roles have always been gender-neutral, voicing concerns over Hegseth's approach potentially undermining women's progress in the military. The discussion centers around combat readiness and the implications of Hegseth's directives on military policy.
Women who served in the US military are pushing back against Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's announcement that the requirements for combat roles will return to the highest male standard, saying the standards have always been the same for men and women.
None of us have ever asked for special treatment, Elisa Cardnell, who served in the US Navy for eleven years, told the BBC.
Speaking to hundreds of generals on Tuesday, Hegseth reiterated his beliefs that the military had lowered standards to accommodate women and put service members at risk. His new directives would bring them back to a higher level, he said.
He maintained that women would not be excluded from the armed forces outright.
As support mounts from groups both for and against Hegseth’s stance, the conversation delves deep into what it means for combat readiness and the potential implications on women's roles moving forward.
